The Colorado Provocation

The Colorado Provocation

The Colorado Provocation

The Colorado Provocation
Ending Democracy

The Democrats' Plan

The Colorado Provocation
Deleted From Twitter

5 Minutes After Posting
The Colorado Provocation

The Colorado Provocation
The Real Insurrectionist
The Colorado Provocation
We Were Warned
The Colorado Provocation

Joe Biden Corrupter
Contact
Joe Biden Corrupter
Your Senator

Joe Biden Corrupter
Contact
Joe Biden Corrupter
Your Congressman
Joe Biden Corrupter


The battle has begun, but for now, we must hold and control!

Why the Colorado decision?

The four (out of seven) Colorado Democrat jurists that voted to throw Donald Trump off the ballot may be loony tunes progressives, but they're not stupid. They knew Trump would appeal their decision to the Supreme Court, nay, HAVE to appeal their decision.

Even though the Colorado Supreme Court justices were all appointed by Democratic governors, it was still a 4-3 decision. The decision has been stayed pending an appeal to Supreme Court by Jan. 4, with the primary deadline to have the names in being Jan. 5.  

There were three written dissents in the case, but the dissent that is catching everyone's eye is the dissent from Justice Carlos Samour. Some have termed it a "road map" for the United States Supreme Court to overturn the Colorado Supreme Court. 

Samour excoriated the majority for a decision that "flies in the face of the due process doctrine.”

    One of the main points of contention is who or what body has the power to enforce or carry out Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which says individuals who engaged in an insurrection may not hold office. Section 5 of the same amendment says Congress has the power to pass laws to enforce section 3. 

    In Samour’s dissent, he argues Congress passed a law in 1870 allowing for both civil and criminal enforcement of Section 3, though the law was repealed and replaced in 1948. The new law, 18 U.S.C § 2383, says an individual can be banned from holding office if they are charged and convicted under the law. Trump has not been charged, much less convicted, under said statute, as pointed out by Samour.

So if Trump hasn't been charged, much less convicted, under the statute that applies, he cannot be removed on this basis, according to Samour. There are other questions about whether or not this provision would even apply to Trump as the president -- the trial court was of the opinion it did not apply to him., but you don't have to get to that if they haven't even charged him under 18 U.S.C § 2383, according to Samour.

The Colorado judges must know that, so, why did they vote the way they did?

The decision is a provocation

The most obvious answer is that the Left wants to create a situation -- to provoke Trump's supporters -- to foment violence and civil unrest. With the Colorado ruling, the Left is actually attempting to create a real insurrection that they can pin on MAGA as the campaign advances.

They believe they can get Trump's supporters to overreact and their allies in the media will take the ball and run it from there. Jesse Watters comments:

    “It feels like the Left wants violence, because that’s where this is going. We’re being baited, so their actions are justified. That’s how it feels. The more the Left overplays their hand, the scarier this gets.”

Now is a time to be disciplined -- to hold and control -- the pendulum of history is swinging in our direction. We mustn't let the Left trap us into a situation where the Obama-Biden axis can accuse MAGA of another "insurrection," giving them an excuse to unleash the military.

Because that's what they want, so their allies in the media can swing the Middle back to the Left. Hollywood is already preparing the psychological battlespace.



So, we must be cool! If they manage to steal another election, we deal with that then. Remember, the Democrats must win this election. If not, Obama loses his revolution and Joe Biden goes to Leavenworth. They are all-in. They have no choice and out of necessity, every conceivable action -- and some that no American has ever thought of before -- is on the table.

They have many cards to play before they play the Joker, and they will play them all.

Victor Davis Hanson examines the situation

Donald Trump is being erased from the Colorado primary (and general?) ballot, by warping the 14th Amendment, and in a way never envisioned by its creators.

So, how can one be guilty by fiat of a Confederacy-like “insurrection,” when Trump has never been charged with, much less convicted of, such a crime?

How can a buffoonish January 6th riot become an “insurrection,” when no one was armed, there was no plan to seize power, and protesters were advised by the purported insurrectionist leader “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard?”

As far as election insurrectionary interference, why did liberal journalist Molly Ball label the left wing effort to defeat Donald Trump in the 2020 election a “cabal”:

    “That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream -- a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information”)?

And why did Ball double-down and further call it a “conspiracy”:

    “There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans, of CEOs, Silicon Valley billionaires, street protesters…Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears.”

As far as efforts to nullify the popular vote, do we remember the pathetic 2016 ensemble of C-list Hollywood celebrities (e.g., Martin Sheen, Debra Messing, James Cromwell, BD Wong, Noah Wyle, Freda Payne, Bob Odenkirk, J. Smith Cameron, Michael Urie, Moby, Mike Farrell, Loretta Swit, Christine Lahti, Steven Pasquale, Dominic Fumusa and Emily Tyra)?

They were drafted by left wing groups to cut commercials urging the electors to reject their constitutional duties of reflecting their states’ popular votes, and instead, as faithless electors, to vote instead for Hillary Clinton, the loser in their respective states’ popular votes.

How did they rationalize that anti-constitutional gambit? Well, remember Martin Sheen’s shameless sophistry to ignore the Constitution and the election results?

    “As you know, our founding fathers built the Electoral College to safeguard the American people from the dangers of a demagogue, and to ensure that the presidency only goes to someone who is to an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.”

So, what makes a high elected official an insurrectionist?

Current or past advocacy for using violence against the government, as represented by, say, the Supreme Court?

Or urging on more Black Lives Matter protests that had turned violent, eventually leading to 35 deaths, 1,500 injured police officers, $1-2 billion in property damage, and a torched courthouse, police headquarters, and iconic church?

Attempting to break into the White House grounds? Sending the president into a secure underground bunker?

If so, remember Kamala Harris’s summer 2020 boasts about the protests that, she knew (contrary to “fact checkers”) had already a long history of violence:

    “But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop, and this is a movement, I'm telling you. They're not gonna stop, and everyone beware, because they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they're not gonna stop after Election Day. Everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they're not going to let up -- and they should not. And we should not.”

What was the Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer intending, when in 2020 he incited a throng at the very doors of the Supreme Court, warning of violence to come to two justices whom he called out by name?

    “I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

“Hit you”?

Now we have ballot suppression to add to the long list of farces, hoaxes, and lies all designed to destroy a candidate who otherwise might win popular support for an agenda the majority of Americans have consistently supported.

So, the left wing Colorado Justices join the “Russian collusion” spectacle, the Alfa Bank “pink” hoax, the “Russian disinformation” laptop ruse, the precedent breaking two impeachments of a president in his first term, the caper of trying an ex-president as a private citizen in the senate, and the ploy of raiding an ex-president’s home.

What exactly is the Left doing?

They accept they have no majority support for the current president or his agenda. They fear the voters will elect a Republican. They are horrified that it might be Donald Trump, whom they especially loathe. And they are terrified that Trump might do to them what they would certainly do if they were in his position.

The Left is mightily frustrated that after controlling all the sources of information, communications, and institutions (e.. CEOs, traditional and social media, entertainment, the Internet, Silicon Valley, academia, K-12, foundations, sports, and popular culture, etc.), and having a vast advantage in fund raising and money, they still cannot stop the will of the majority.

And the Left wages lawfare because they assume the Right is either too timid, too incompetent, too preoccupied, or too principled to reciprocate in kind -- especially given they gloat that there were never any consequences for all the past hoaxes and ruses they perpetuated.

But this time they may have jumped the proverbial shark and shown themselves to be the true and only insurrectionists that will face the consequences of any angry public in November 2024.

The comeback story

Throughout the timeline of human endeavors, the greatest stories have always been the comeback story.  From the divinity of the resurrection to the great stories of human achievement; the greatest stories -- the ones that inspire legend -- are always about the comeback.

The story of defeat, followed by a powerful return. A story of a people's will, resilience, determination and resolve, is always the story that endures and inspires. To learn and return -- bolder, stronger and with more power than before. That is the story that brings out emotion because we can all connect to it. 

The comeback is always greater than the setback, but, for now, we must hold and control, and not let these enemies of the Constitution push us into making a mistake that can't be undone.

The Colorado Provocation



Merry Christmas!
The Colorado Provocation

Comments
The Colorado Provocation

Grossly Negigent

The Colorado Provocation


Portal
Get The Portal
Portal
Save The Link
Portal

Members
Get The Essays
Members
Most Sunday Mornings
Portal

line

All the videos playing
at once?
Get your browser's
HTML5 Autoplay Blocker
extension

line flipped

Transmania

Click the little box
to see videos "full screen"
and Esc to return

Transmania